Obama’s Birth Certificate Contains Words That Didn’t Exist In 1961 According to New Report


Barack Hussein Obama II popularly called by his first name Obama was born on August 4, 1961. He  is the 44th and incumbent President of the United States, and the very first African-American to hold the office of the President in America. Based on report, he was born in Honolulu, the state capital and the most populous city in the U.S. state of Hawaii. His journey to stardom didn’t just start overnight, the awe-inspiring president was once the president  of the Harvard Law Review while in Harvard Law School and was also a community organizer in Chicago before acquiring his law degree.

The content of his birth certificate has raised concerns among many considering the four key flaws on his birth certificate. The four flaws had in the past cropped up bruising debates and arguments starting from April 2011, when President Barack Obama sought to put an end to rumors claiming that he was not a natural-born citizen of the United States. As a result of that, he obtained and released a copy of his long form birth certificate given by the state of Hawaii of which officials from that state confirmed that the copy of the certificate they issued to President Obama was original.

After thorough research, Obama is up against the four simple questions raised by a New Jersey Attorney on his birth certificate. Read on to see the contents of Obama’s birth certificate that raised huge doubts over his birth in America.


First, “How come  Obama’s birth certificate’ states he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even in existence at the time of his birth. Considering the fact that back in 1961 people of such color were referred to as ‘Negroes’, could it be that the certificate was tampered with?

Secondly, the birth certificate released by White House records Obama’s date of birth to be on August 4, 1961  and lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. Also the birth certificate in question shows that his father is aged 25 years older than Obama, and was born in “Kenya , East Africa”. On the part of Barack Hussein Obama II, it is not big an issue considering the time of Obama’s birth right? But what would you say about his father who he claimed was born in a country that didn’t exist before that time. Of course, this would not have been a problem, except for the fact that Kenya didn’t exist until 1963, which means that Obama II is two years older than the present Kenya.

According to record, Kenya didn’t exist until 1963, two years after Obama was born and probably 27 years after his fathers birth. How could Americans not have known this fact? Most certainly, the above analysis shows that there is something yet to be uncovered. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that didn’t yet exist until Kenya 1963? Kenya was known as “British East Africa Protectorate” before 1963. Ordinarily, this wouldn’t raise much concern except for that very fact.


Thirdly, the Birth Certificate that was provided by the White House revealed that, Obama’s place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This is likely not to be, as the hospital(s) in question were refered to as ”KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” in 1961 and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. The  name only changed to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital in 1978, when these two hospitals fused into a single hospital. The name of the hospital he was supposedly born at should have been “Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital” or “Kapi’olani Maternity Hom”until 1978.

Lastly although not the least, It may be possible to get a clue from  Obama’s book on his father. He explicitly expressed  how much he is pleased with his father for fighting in WW II. If his birth certificate says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born.

Then it shows that his father’s date might be estimated at 1936, now if my guess is right, how many three-year old kid fight in wars as WW II was between 1939 and 1945?  At the very least, his father wouldn’t have been more than 9 years old in the latest stages of WW II. As it stands now, we need a non-revised version of the history book, the version that has not been changed to fulfill the author’s motives.